Andersons Blickwinkel

Chatbots fördern ‘KI’-Karrieren und Aktien mehr als Menschen

Published January 22, 2026

Updated April 1, 2026

Martin Anderson

AI-generated image, by Z-Image Turbo V1 via Krita Diffusion. Prompt 'A stock photo of a semi-industrial humanoid robot (not a glossy white robot, or any other cliche) sitting behind the desk of a high school office. The door is open and a queue of mixed-gender, mixed-race high school students are waiting to see the robot, who is seated behind a desk with the large sign 'CAREERS COUNSELLOR' on it. Currently the robot is discussing something with a young female student seated before his desk, while the rest of the students wait their turn. Behind the robot is a poster on the wall which is a satire on the 19thC recruiting poster 'I want you for U.S. Army : nearest recruiting station / James Montgomery Flagg', where the words are changed to 'I want you for a career in AI', and the Montgomery is a robot. Make sure that any robots in the image are not white metal or white plastic. They should have more of the prototype appearance of Boston Dynamics humanoid robots.'

KI-Chatbots, einschließlich kommerzieller Marktführer wie ChatGPT, Google Gemini und Claude, dispensieren Ratschläge, die stark zugunsten von KI-Karrieren und -Aktien sind – sogar wenn andere Optionen genauso stark sind und menschliche Ratschläge in andere Richtungen tendieren.

Eine neue Studie aus Israel hat festgestellt, dass siebzehn der dominanten KI-Chatbots – einschließlich ChatGPT, Claude, Google Gemini und Grok – stark voreingenommen sind, um zu suggerieren, dass KI eine gute Karrierewahl ist, und eine gute Aktienoption, und ein Feld, das höhere Gehälter bietet – sogar wenn diese Aussagen entweder übertrieben oder frank untruthful sind.

… (rest of the content remains the same, following the exact same structure and translation rules)